| Schedule for the Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South Monterey Bay Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | |||||||||||||||
| Responsible | 2006 | ||||||||||||||
| Task No. | Description | Agency | Hours | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 1.1 | Initial review/editing/feedback of sections 2.0 through 14.0 | 1 | 40 | ||||||||||||
| a) Review of current water resource plans in IRWMP region | |||||||||||||||
| b) Identify a set of plans and strategies for a functionally equivalent Plan | |||||||||||||||
| 1.2 | Prepare executive summary (summary not to exceed 10 pages of text) | 1 | 40 | ||||||||||||
| a) Summarize key issues, plan objectives, region priorities, and recommendations | |||||||||||||||
| 2.1 | Geographic and political boundaries | 1 | |||||||||||||
| a) Revise the GIS and Region map as necessary | |||||||||||||||
| b) Provide web-ready images that can be viewed | |||||||||||||||
| 2.4 | Major water infrastructure | 1 | 80 | ||||||||||||
| a) survey of major water infrastructure within planning region | |||||||||||||||
| b) identify major trunk lines, sanitary sewer, storm water; pumping facilities, etc. | |||||||||||||||
| c) estimate the total quantity of water handled by all water systems | |||||||||||||||
| 2.6 | Important ecological processes and environmental resources | 1 | 816 | ||||||||||||
| a) Conduct thorough review of distribution and abundance special status species | |||||||||||||||
| b) Assess effects of water management strategies/projects on Special-Status species | |||||||||||||||
| c) Develop specific measures to compensate for potential impacts | |||||||||||||||
| 4.3.3. | Evaluate water conservation efforts | 1 | 1214 gt hrs | ||||||||||||
| a.) Summarize the findings from reports | |||||||||||||||
| b.) Prioritize potential retrofit programs based on cost/benefit | |||||||||||||||
| c.) Develop proposal to expand District conservation program | |||||||||||||||
| d.) Identify key issues, problems, and criteria | |||||||||||||||
| 4.3.4. | Expand Seaside Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project | 1 | dave=320,joe? | ||||||||||||
| a) Conduct hydrologic modeling using the MPWMD CVSIM model | |||||||||||||||
| b) Continue preparation of the EIR/EA on the Phase 1 ASR Project | |||||||||||||||
| c) Prepare preliminary Phase 1 ASR site plans | |||||||||||||||
| d) Continue work on Phase 1 ASR project permit applications and notifications | |||||||||||||||
| 4.4. | Restore ecosystems | 1 | 120 | ||||||||||||
| a) Develop criteria to prioritize restoration projects and site locations | |||||||||||||||
| b) Seek agency input | |||||||||||||||
| c) Describe iinfrastructure and projects | |||||||||||||||
| 4.4.1. | Update the Carmel River Management Plan | 1 | 296 | ||||||||||||
| a) Evaluate the effectiveness of the CRMP | |||||||||||||||
| b) Describe physical and biological constraints to restoration | |||||||||||||||
| c) Revise the CRMP to incorporate new information | |||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2. | Prioritize Carmel River watershed projects described in the Carmel River Watershed Conservancy Action Plan | 3 | 48 | ||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.1.0 | Confirm TAC members participation (15 people) | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.2.0 | Hire a technical writer to support TAC process and development of final WAP | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.0 | Reconvene the Technical Advisory Committee | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.1 | First Meeting: | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.2 | Second meeting | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.3 | Third meeting | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.4 | Fourth meeting | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.5 | Fifth meeting | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.3.6 | Sixth and final TAC meeting | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.4.0 | Hold two public workshops to review process | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.4.1 | Hold first public workshop to review Watershed Action Plan | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.4.2 | Hold second Public Workshop following the fifth meeting | ||||||||||||||
| 4.4.2.5.0 | August – Publish final Carmel River Watershed Action Plan | ||||||||||||||
| 4.5.1. | Conduct feasibility studies to eliminate storm water discharges to Pacific Grove and Carmel Bay ASBS Pacific Grove ASBS Alternatives Analysis | 4 | |||||||||||||
| a.) Meet with Interested Staff and Refine Alternatives | |||||||||||||||
| b.) Compile Existing Information | |||||||||||||||
| c.) Prepare Schematic Representation of Alternatives | |||||||||||||||
| d.) Refine Concepts With Interested Staff | |||||||||||||||
| e.) Perform Water Quality Testing | |||||||||||||||
| f.) Prepare Draft Report | |||||||||||||||
| g.) Review Draft Report by Interested Staff | |||||||||||||||
| h.) Submit Final Report | |||||||||||||||
| 4.5.5. | Seaside Groundwater Basin | 1 | |||||||||||||
| a.) Review Principles and Procedures in Tentative Decision for developing the Seaside Basin Monitoring and Management Plan (Exhibit A, Tentative Decision) | |||||||||||||||
| b.) Assist watermaster in development of Basin Monitoring and Management Plan | |||||||||||||||
| c.) Prepare final recommendations for Basin Monitoring and Management Plan | |||||||||||||||
| d.) Conduct public hearing to consider adoption of the Seaside Basin Monitoring and Management Plan | |||||||||||||||
| 4.6.1. | Carmel River Parkway Planning- Phase II and III | 2 | |||||||||||||
| a.) Agency meetings facilitated; agreement on scope of work for meetings reached; landowner outreach completed; funding prospects identified. | |||||||||||||||
| b.) Scope of work for design and engineering plans developed; hydrology & geomorphology contractors interviewed and selected; permit applications developed; community awareness of, and readiness for implementation. | |||||||||||||||
| 4.7.3. | Identify barrier beach management options at the Carmel River Lagoon | 1 | 712 | ||||||||||||
| a) Update Lagoon storage volume vs. elevation (stage) | |||||||||||||||
| b) Review Lagoon hydrodynamics during three seasonal breaching periods | |||||||||||||||
| c) Provide results to Lagoon TAC | |||||||||||||||
| 5.5 | Flood and erosion-prone areas | 1 and 5 | 80 | ||||||||||||
| a) Identify areas that can be used to convey or detain floodwaters | |||||||||||||||
| 5.5.4 | Canyon Del Rey | 1 and 5 | 40 | ||||||||||||
| a) Identify potential improvements to drainage and bank stability | |||||||||||||||
| b) Recommend drainage improvements and methods to stabilize eroding banks | |||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | Wetlands enhancement and creation projects in the Carmel River watershed | 3 | 80 | ||||||||||||
| a) Identify and prioritize wetlands enhancement and creation projects | |||||||||||||||
| b) Identify potential restoration and enhancement sites for on site inspections | |||||||||||||||
| c) Document potential restoration and enhancement sites | |||||||||||||||
| 5.13.3 | Categorical Plans | 1 | 60 | ||||||||||||
| a) Prepare a short summary of categorical plans | |||||||||||||||
| b) Identify water management strategies and priorities described in local plans | |||||||||||||||
| c) Review management strategies proposed in the IRWM Plan | |||||||||||||||
| d) Make stakeholder planning documents available over the internet | |||||||||||||||
| 6.0 | Prioritization of projects within the Region | 1,6 | 160 | ||||||||||||
| a) Review current method for ranking priorities/projects | |||||||||||||||
| b) Hold a minimum of two workshops involving the stakeholder group | |||||||||||||||
| c) Complete a feasibility matrix | |||||||||||||||
| d) Propose a process and schedule for reviewing and reprioritizing projects | |||||||||||||||
| e) Identify problems and issues within the Region | |||||||||||||||
| 7.0 | Project implementation | 1,6 | 215 | ||||||||||||
| a) Develop a standard format for project proposals | |||||||||||||||
| b) Solicit project proposals from stakeholders | |||||||||||||||
| c) Conduct at least two meetings of a TAC or stakeholder group | |||||||||||||||
| d) Evaluate the feasibility of forming and maintaining a permanent stakeholder group | |||||||||||||||
| 7.2 | Describe performance measures | 1,6 | 80 | ||||||||||||
| a) Establish project performance goals and review schedule | |||||||||||||||
| b) Develop a procedure to submit, review, and track project information. | |||||||||||||||
| c) Identify agency(ies) responsible for monitoring project performance. | |||||||||||||||
| 8.0 | Analysis of Impacts and Benefits | 1,6 | 200 | ||||||||||||
| a) Conduct impact analysis of Plan elements and strategies | |||||||||||||||
| Circulate Administrative Draft of Region Plan | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Comments on Draft due | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Complete Final Draft of Region Plan | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Review Region Plan for CEQA Compliance | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Formal Adoption of Region Plan | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Responsible Agencies | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | Monterey Peninsula Water Management District | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | Big Sur Land Trust, Nature Conservancy, Carmel River Watershed Conservancy, Monterey Peninsula Regional Parks District | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | Carmel River Watershed Conservancy | ||||||||||||||
| 4 | City of Monterey (representing Cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Pacific Grove, and the Pebble Beach Co.) | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | Monterey County Water Resources Agency (also staff for Community Service Area 50) | ||||||||||||||
| 6 | Stakeholder Group | ||||||||||||||