EXHIBIT 2-C

BRAINSTORMING TEMPLATE FOR WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES—

MPWMD Special Workshop, August 25, 2011

 

Alternative Category:  __________________________________________ (ASR, desal, recycle, etc)

Project Name:   ________________________________________________________ (be specific)

Project Sponsors:  _________________________________________________ (suggested sponsor)

Location:  ______________________________________________________________ (describe)

Project Description: ____________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________ (describe concept)

 

 

ATTRIBUTE

 

NOTES and COMMENTS

Identify tasks needed to obtain essential information

YIELD (AFY)

*Avg./long-term

*Minimum

*Maximum

 

 

 

 

Consider factors that might affect yield; what is expected life?

COST

*Capital cost

*O&M

*Unit cost ($/AF)

 

 

 

 

Consider factors that might affect costs

TIMELINE

*CEQA/NEPA

*Permits (see below)

*Site Acquisition

*Design

*Construction

*Water Delivery

 

Consider factors that affect timeline to water delivery.

PROS & CONS

 

*Benefits

 

 

 

Ex: timely, drought-proof, affordable

*Drawbacks

 

 

 

Ex: uncertain technology, high cost, weather dependent

OTHER

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERMITS

*Federal Agencies

*State Agencies

*Local Agencies

 

NEPA, ESA, 404, 401

CEQA, Water Rights, 1601/1603

Traffic, Air Quality, Wells

 

USFWS, NMFS, Corps, EPA, Sanctuary

SWRCB, RWQCB, CDFG, CCC, CDPH

TAMC, MBUAPCD, County (Health and Planning), cities

 

U:\staff\word\committees\WaterSupply\2011\20110811\02\item2_exh2c.docx