ITEM:

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

 

4.

CONSIDER REQUEST FROM DIRECTOR BROWER TO SECURE A $2 MILLION LINE OF CREDIT

 

Meeting Date:

May 13, 2008

Budgeted: 

No

 

From:

Darby Fuerst,

Program/

N/A

 

General Manager

Line Item No.:    

 

Prepared By:

 

Rick Dickhaut

Cost Estimate:

$500

General Counsel Approval:  N/A

Committee Recommendation:  The Administrative Committee considered this item on May 13, 2008 and recommended _____________.

CEQA Compliance:  N/A

 

SUMMARY:  In response to a request from Director Brower that the Board consider securing a $2 million line of credit as discussed in the background section of this staff note, District staff has done some preliminary research with a couple of area banks.  Although a bank would need to do a careful review of the last three years of the District’s audited financial statements before committing to issue a letter of credit, preliminary indications are that it should not be a problem.  The District would most likely qualify for a line of credit with a variable interest rate that would be tied to the Wall Street Prime Rate with a margin from the rate depending on the District’s credit worthiness.  The banks have indicated that the costs to establish a line of credit would be minimal, possibly as low as a $250 documentation fee.  They also indicated there would be no ongoing costs, other than interest if the credit line is used.  If the Board decides to go forward with Director Brower’s request, staff will move forward to establish the line of credit in a timely manner.  

 

RECOMMENDATION:  The Administrative Committee reviewed this item at its May 13, 2008 meeting and voted __ to __ to recommend ______________.  

 

BACKGROUND:  Director Brower has requested that the Board direct staff to secure a $2 million line of credit to fund potential startup costs associated with the MPWMD 95-10 Project (desalination project in the Sand City area) if it is deemed feasible by the preliminary studies currently under way.  The amount borrowed via the line of credit would be repaid from either an increased user fee, a portion of debt issuance proceeds for the project, other revenue increases or a combination of these sources.

 

EXHIBITS:  None

 

 

 

 

 

U:\staff\word\committees\Admin\2008\20080513\04\item4.doc